The sites that the following info comes from are all respected/trusted sources, if this news came from theinquirer or spong, I wouldnt even bother posting
Crippler(I think) and myself(maybe some others, forgive me for not remembering who you are) are strong supporters of the unified system memory architecture and some may recall that we said the time would come when developers started noticing the differences and speaking about it. That time has come...
Taken from Games Radar, from Edge magazine:
"Further to the Edge comments this month about how much better Call Of Duty 3 looks on 360 in comparison to the PS3 version, I noticed this in GamesTM this month On Rainbow Six Vegas.....
'' .....a chat with the Ubisoft development team shed a little light on he matter."All I'm able to say is that we're looking to ship on PS3 as well but we're not having specific content.....we're developing with 360 as our main development platform and porting to PS3 means that there's less memory available for us to use, but we're trying to minimise any drop in quality"..Such comments sugget that the gap in performance between Playstation3 and Xbox 360 is nowhere near as powerful as some would like us to believe and that the console may even be less able than Microsoft's..."
They also go on to say that only the 360 version will feature the face mapping technolgy and that their are no plans for PS3/PSP linkage or to use the sixaxis tilt technology.
I'd like to see the *entire* interview and am still looking diligently
Source
Do with that info as you must, but its definitely revealing in some way. Nevermind the "CoD 3" comment(although its interesting indeed).
**This points to maybe why they are making Splinter 5 only for the 360(along with money being thrown at them ofcourse). Forget about all these ports and focus on 1 system and tap into its true power I say!!. Fincancially its not very sound, but from my couch it means a hell of a lot
Also remember that the big Dev studios like EA, Ubi and others got devkits looooong ago, with sony also touting that during the launch development stages, they were far ahead of where MS was at the same point in time as far as dev kits. So people cant say they didnt have enough time to get CoD 3 and Rainbow Six up to snuff seeing as its *supposed* to be "so much more powerful than the prematurely launched 360"
**Dont blame me for posting this. Blame Sony, who STILL says that "the Next Generation of gaming doesnt start until we say it does"
Linear Mode
