Comparison: Is the 40GB PS3 such a bad deal?

[BrewCityUpstart]

Is the 40GB PS3 really such a bad deal? We stacked a number of systems side by side to see which gaming console is the best value (at least, in terms of hardware). For example, when compared to the Xbox 360, the $399 PS3 may seem like a pretty good deal, provided you're looking for built-in wi-fi and an HD movie player. These two peripherals cost $99 and $179 each for the Xbox 360.

However, let's not forget that the 20GB Xbox 360 includes some backwards compatibility support (the 40GB PS3 does not). In addition, you get two free games with the system.

The 60GB PS3 is in an interesting position right now, as it currently costs the same as the 80GB model. For the same price, you can get a larger hard drive and a free game. The only difference? The 80GB has more limited backwards compatibility support. Patrick Seybold from SCEA reminds us that "There are no plans to lower the price of the 60GB model. The 60GB model has nearly 95% backwards compatibility, so consumers looking for that feature have the option while supplies last."

lbik

[WormholeXtreme]

The best PS3 version I think was the 20GB version. It was all black and I replaced the 20GB drive with a 160GB drive. Of course there is no conetent to fill the drive with yet. I'm hoping they start offering some On Demand movies and shows like the 360 has. Only I expect Sony to offer them in 1080P on the PS3. It shouldn't take too long to download them with my 30mbs FIOS connection.

[Lord Geoff]

The new PS3 SKU is definitely a step in the right direction. I think it will be the thing that gets things rolling for Sony. I hope. The price is right for the holidays. Good for them!